From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63B16FFD8 for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2a00:14f0:e04c:51ac:e23f:49ff:fe47:b7fd] (helo=phil-desktop) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aH9Uj-0000lb-Rd; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 13:16:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1452169004.3116.29.camel@pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Robert Yang , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 12:16:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <228ce5dac7d96467f7165add45a39cfcd12c7bfc.1452152689.git.liezhi.yang@windriver.com> References: <228ce5dac7d96467f7165add45a39cfcd12c7bfc.1452152689.git.liezhi.yang@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] liberation-fonts: can't be allarch X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 12:16:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 23:45 -0800, Robert Yang wrote: > liberation-fonts inherit fontcache which would depend on fontconfig, > and fontconfig is not allarch, so that liberation-fonts can't be > allarch. This doesn't make any sense. I don't think allarch is, or ever has been, contagious in that way. There is no good reason I can think of to require that all the dependencies of an allarch package should themselves be allarch. Indeed, if we did require this then it would probably mean that virtually no packages could legitimately be allarch. p.