From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72622606BF for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 23:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=e130.local) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aHKA6-0001u4-Ew; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:40:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1452210004.2002.129.camel@pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Andre McCurdy Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:40:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1452205752-6353-4-git-send-email-armccurdy@gmail.com> References: <1452205752-6353-1-git-send-email-armccurdy@gmail.com> <1452205752-6353-4-git-send-email-armccurdy@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] libav.inc: duplicate armv7a over-rides for armv7ve X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 23:40:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 14:29 -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote: > FULL_OPTIMIZATION_armv7a = "-fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer -O4 -ffast-math" > +FULL_OPTIMIZATION_armv7ve = "-fexpensive-optimizations -fomit-frame-pointer -O4 -ffast-math" I wonder if this would be better as just FULL_OPTIMIZATION_arm. That said, the OPTIMIZATION variables are primarily distro knobs and it's not entirely clear that individual packages ought to be overriding them at all. Does anybody know whether there is any actual science behind the use of those flags on armv7a specifically? p.