public inbox for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] libav.inc: duplicate armv7a over-rides for armv7ve
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:42:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452591757.1950.33.camel@pbcl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E2CA517-1339-416B-832B-AB2EFF04CEE6@gmail.com>

On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 14:58 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> it came into ffmpeg circa 2008 and proliferated into related components primarily to support vectorization and neon
> which was quite nascent for ARM architecture in those days in gcc. Today if you were to configure libav with default options
> then it uses mainly -fomit-frame-pointer-O3 -fno-math-errno -fno-signed-zeros -fno-tree-vectorize
> 
> which is primarily -Ofast -fno-tree-vectorize

I think -fno-tree-vectorize is just there as a workaround for old
compilers.  It sounds like you're saying that ffmpeg basically just
wants "-Ofast", and by implication it wants this on all architectures.
So in that case there is no need for a FULL_OPTIMIZATION override on
arm, let alone armv7a specifically.

Whether ffmpeg ought to be forcing its own FULL_OPTIMIZATION at all
versus leaving it up to the distro is another question.  Personally I
think that individual recipes have no business setting those variables,
and ffmpeg is no exception, but I don't have a particularly strong
opinion either way.

p.




  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-12  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-07 22:29 [PATCH v2 0/4] fixup armv7a over-rides for armv7ve Andre McCurdy
2016-01-07 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] valgrind: don't restrict to armv7a Andre McCurdy
2016-01-07 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] gcc-configure-common.inc: duplicate armv7a over-ride for armv7ve Andre McCurdy
2016-01-07 23:34   ` Phil Blundell
2016-01-08  1:16     ` Andre McCurdy
2016-01-07 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] libav.inc: duplicate armv7a over-rides " Andre McCurdy
2016-01-07 23:40   ` Phil Blundell
2016-01-08  2:29     ` Andre McCurdy
2016-01-11 22:58     ` Khem Raj
2016-01-11 23:07       ` Richard Purdie
2016-01-11 23:18         ` Khem Raj
2016-01-11 23:18         ` Andre McCurdy
2016-01-12  9:42       ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2016-01-12 16:26         ` Khem Raj
2016-01-07 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] libpostproc: " Andre McCurdy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1452591757.1950.33.camel@pbcl.net \
    --to=pb@pbcl.net \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox