From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4D077223 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.183.132.29] (helo=e130) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aPwLx-0001De-Rr; Sun, 31 Jan 2016 19:04:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1454263402.7421.23.camel@pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Khem Raj Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:03:22 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Glibc 2.24 _might_ require minimum kernel version 3.2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 18:04:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [cross-posting trimmed...] On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 09:41 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > This is FYI, as I have sent a RFT for glibc 2.24, Um, have you? 2.23 hasn't been released yet and I think that's the version you sent an RFT for. 2.24 is still some way off. p.