From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C05D6FEF5 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u12G1JZv013390; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:01:19 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4U2C2HmrCOQe; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:01:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u12G1EoQ013387 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:01:16 GMT Message-ID: <1454428874.27087.87.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Mike Crowe , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 16:01:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1454424587-4251-1-git-send-email-mac@mcrowe.com> References: <1454424587-4251-1-git-send-email-mac@mcrowe.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remove unhelpful default value of EXTRA_OEMAKE X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 16:01:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 14:49 +0000, Mike Crowe wrote: > bitbake.conf currently contains: > > EXTRA_OEMAKE = "-e MAKEFLAGS=" > > Back in November[1] I submitted a patch that allowed this default > value to be overridden without affecting anything else that was > appended to it. I received feedback that the default value was no > longer useful and that it would be good to get rid of it. > > So, this patch series fixes the two recipes that still appear to be > relying on the previous default and then makes the default > EXTRA_OEMAKE = "". After these changes core-image-sato builds > successfully for me (although I have not run it.) > > Mike. > > [1] http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-No > vember/112393.html This is a pretty major change and we likely need a bit more of an idea of impact. Which architectures did you test? Often, x86 is a bad choice here and we'd need something cross (arm/mips/ppc) to ensure it really is doing the right things. We also need to assess a bit more than just sato. We can run this up on the autobuilder and see what happens. A post to the architecture list is probably needed so everyone knows this is happening (or at least being considered). I do worry how much of meta-oe may be affected by this. Martin: Any opinion on this? Cheers, Richard