From: Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Default value for FULL_OPTIMIZATION
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 21:08:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454533708.7421.61.camel@pbcl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKF1srGn-maJcvPLQSV6Xz7RgU4N1Jipr+Oc9AH_B1xsj-UQw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 12:59 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> in systems of this age it should be yet.
Sorry, I didn't really understand that comment.
For what it's worth, as a very quick and fairly unscientific comparison,
I did "time make -j4" in a glibc tree and got:
real 1m38.812s
user 4m6.420s
sys 0m23.148s
and then I cleaned the tree and did "time make -j4 CFLAGS='-O2 -g
-pipe'" and got:
real 1m37.299s
user 4m21.420s
sys 0m27.304s
I'm not sure these results are statistically significant but on this
very limited evidence it certainly doesn't look like -pipe is providing
any transformational benefits. The real time has gone down a tiny bit,
which suggests that -pipe is giving some extra parallelism, but the
system and user time have both actually gone up in the second case.
p.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-03 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-02 13:26 Default value for FULL_OPTIMIZATION Pascal Bach
2016-02-02 14:26 ` Mike Looijmans
2016-02-02 16:23 ` Pascal Bach
2016-02-02 14:47 ` Richard Purdie
2016-02-02 20:52 ` Phil Blundell
2016-02-03 6:17 ` Khem Raj
2016-02-03 20:48 ` Phil Blundell
2016-02-03 20:51 ` Khem Raj
2016-02-03 20:54 ` Burton, Ross
2016-02-03 20:57 ` Phil Blundell
2016-02-03 20:59 ` Khem Raj
2016-02-03 21:08 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2016-02-03 22:37 ` Khem Raj
2016-02-04 12:56 ` Mike Looijmans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454533708.7421.61.camel@pbcl.net \
--to=pb@pbcl.net \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox