From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8887473D27 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id d63so193801400ioj.2 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 05:11:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ctbonIx7JD3b+rVovReZDBQcTZaMUOyu6QA0QBR/NZ0=; b=IEGOSKW38YfXHn3aRv9whh8EYOk+s8FY1iEeeivHA13I7B6SfCCJVeAmilt324KWC3 05EuYJyIMM7dytW881ACp85zahTKr7XyXitZ6oNHoiPo+SLQ+hi0GcKLGSNX/pK4fTB6 b77lkvXRCDRHXDFtI9KzR+QEPLomX1s9tt8iC35QiwthPHA5ISiIIKmJ5LTHfiYW7c8P Nu3J0BN+0HxY7izcscvtOnn9SzgamYRApfELdBr0S7jtf5KiQuJ/LkyBQzRv/1I1o4P6 GvyxmKFil+Cak5XfYu2TWSRFgE5Fr2Z541CI057H/IkU6tZI2S4exIx8Go7PblAskVeR Hj/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ctbonIx7JD3b+rVovReZDBQcTZaMUOyu6QA0QBR/NZ0=; b=iXAUYdCixEpfVE5PhOZrs/NumvMS0yVSpkTezaw216AtUo7hiJpd0u1Gmh+UT36WlB dMYDui+RxFJMZRdulp1OSgI7DAo1NFFzc3fpHfw1uYlYZecYq3wFmiRYlAqFEY2OvMq0 rxJAJ71xeF1x7IhsEBpiYdVN/yzo3K3tRHWADn3vvfWw0YpVNSu8kKVPRpvvnTBevFbe tHirKp9B+YFg6F09ULoBbqk6EaoWpihj1TBqONjonQPA8YM6LX0tAyMtPslWCc3k8iAt kfdYSz8/jybFP6CJHO2aW0C0PnV1hxYfCCj65mJRDZ2exts4AniueuWrc2ucCByuigLU cRiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTA7U86QyCC9SP5E3fvndJolbD3G7nkCtGAZJ4+L4oAqrdiYNs3gopJGNz8SQm5ht/U X-Received: by 10.107.184.135 with SMTP id i129mr21857434iof.4.1454937076586; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 05:11:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 ([87.165.127.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 77sm12362510ioh.21.2016.02.08.05.11.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Feb 2016 05:11:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1454937068.8641.7.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Khem Raj Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:11:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] binutils 2.26 upgrade X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 13:11:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 06:28 +0000, Khem Raj wrote: > Upgrade binutils to 2.26 Has anyone besides us encountered issues when compiling u-boot with the new binutils? It builds, but then fails at runtime. Bug filed at https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9057 So far it is not clear what exactly the problem is, only that reverting the binutils upgrade avoids it. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.