From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51F2731FE for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u1C8WE4P009368; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:32:14 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 37joHobdO86m; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:32:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u1C8W8NZ009349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:32:09 GMT Message-ID: <1455265928.16142.269.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Gary Thomas , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:32:08 +0000 In-Reply-To: <56BD97ED.1040802@mlbassoc.com> References: <1455249507-30989-1-git-send-email-gary@mlbassoc.com> <1455265043.16142.267.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <56BD97ED.1040802@mlbassoc.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ffmpeg: Add -dbg packages for all libraries X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:32:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 09:29 +0100, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2016-02-12 09:17, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 04:58 +0100, Gary Thomas wrote: > > > Improve the packaging of the libraries built by this recipe. > > > These > > > are created using special code in the recipe and the debug (-dbg) > > > packages were not being created. Adding these packages allow the > > > libraries in question to be debugged using GDB. > > > > This isn't really policy, the policy is one -dbg package per recipe > > and > > that is how the dependency chains and dbg-pkgs in IMAGE_FEATURES > > work > > and so on. > > > > I'm not arguing this is perfect, its not and I would like to see it > > change. It is how it all works today though. Is there a pressing > > reason > > we need to do something different here? > > Without this change, none of the [renamed] libraries generated by > the ffmpeg recipe have debug symbols available. As is, the recipe > is generating separate -dev packages for each library - how is that > different [policy-wise]? > > Should the -dev and -dbg info for the libraries be bundled into > ffmpeg-dbg and ffmpeg-dev? Or perhaps the machinations generating > the -dev packages in that recipe are just wrong? There should only be one -dev package too. As you saying the debug symbols are getting placed into the -dev packages? They must be getting placed and hence packaged somewhere? Cheers, Richard