From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D50375894 for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u1TKeoQ2031125; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:40:50 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qcqTEeiVksHN; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:40:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u1TKeng4031121 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:40:50 GMT Message-ID: <1456778449.11498.183.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Martin Jansa , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:40:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1456773039-5178-1-git-send-email-Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> References: <1456773039-5178-1-git-send-email-Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] no-static-libs.inc: add gdb X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:40:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 20:10 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > * gdb has own bundled version of readline and do_compile fails with: > | config.status: creating config.h > | make[2]: *** No rule to make target '../readline/libreadline.a', > needed by 'gdb'. Stop. > | make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa I'm a bit puzzled as our autobuilders build this all the time and we don't see failures. Any idea what the configuration difference might be? Cheers, Richard