From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B8D761D8 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2016 03:30:34 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,532,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="900272923" Received: from jlock-mobl1.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.252.14.114]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2016 03:30:33 -0800 Message-ID: <1457004633.3025.13.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Joshua G Lock To: "Viguera, Javier" , "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:30:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <1456337679-4602-1-git-send-email-javier.viguera@digi.com> <1457003268.3025.9.camel@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 (3.18.5.1-1.fc23) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [jethro][PATCH] bluez5: allow D-Bus to spawn obexd in systems without systemd X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:30:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 11:22 +0000, Viguera, Javier wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joshua G Lock [mailto:joshua.g.lock@linux.intel.com]  > > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 12:08 PM > > To: Viguera, Javier; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [jethro][PATCH] bluez5: allow D-Bus to spawn > > obexd in systems without systemd > > > > This looks like a valid patch for the master branch too? > Absolutely. That's why I sent both patches together, one for master > and this one for Jethro. > > See the one for master:  > > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/116389/ Ah, I hadn't seen that patch as I was only looking at patches tagged jethro. We can consider this change for jethro once it lands in master. > > By the way, for Jethro I sent also a different patch (master > backport): > > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/116661/ > > This last one is already in master and it would be great to have it > in Jethro as well. I just included this patch in a consolidated Jethro pull request. Regards, Joshua