From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B77F6E5CC for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 16:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([213.210.30.29] helo=phil-desktop) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1abWBB-0007pO-H4; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 17:32:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1457022764.3476.46.camel@pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Andre McCurdy , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:32:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1456361325-19298-1-git-send-email-armccurdy@gmail.com> References: <1456361325-19298-1-git-send-email-armccurdy@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] boost.inc: limit ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET over-rides to armv4/armv5 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:32:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 16:48 -0800, Andre McCurdy wrote: > The original over-ride dates back to 2009: > >   http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=43e94412c4 > 5b4b79485a64010c76d89b245bb235 > > There are no obvious issues seen now when building boost in thumb2 > for Cortex A15. Conceptually, this patch has the same armv6 problem as the glib-2.0 one I mentioned earlier.  But actually, boost seems to compile just fine as Thumb-1 for armv5te, so I suspect that in this case the override is just plain obsolete and could safely be deleted altogether. p.