From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC2B73172 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u2BHfZwF013983; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:41:35 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lQVrfzUmzu9I; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:41:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u2BHfWFI013980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:41:33 GMT Message-ID: <1457718092.2804.258.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Joshua Lock , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:41:32 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Remove RPM 4 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:41:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 14:07 +0000, Joshua Lock wrote: > This series removes RPM 4 and code to support it from OE Core. There > are > several known issues with using RPM 4 and it seems better to > acknowledge it's > unsupported by removing it from OE-Core than to leave it in a non > -functional > state. > > Please review the following changes for suitability for inclusion. If > you have > any objections or suggestions for improvement, please respond to the > patches. If > you agree with the changes, please provide your Acked-by. I think I'm in favour of removing it at this point as its not getting much attention. I'd note that we need to remove the QA test for it: selftest/imagefeatures.py: def test_rpm_version_4_support_on_image(self): Cheers, Richard