From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975896FF72 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2016 07:40:36 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,335,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="669296865" Received: from vmresent-mobl10.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO jlock-mobl1.gar.corp.intel.com) ([10.252.3.41]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2016 07:40:35 -0700 Message-ID: <1457966429.3209.9.camel@linux.intel.com> From: Joshua G Lock To: Richard Purdie , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:40:29 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1457718092.2804.258.camel@linuxfoundation.org> References: <1457718092.2804.258.camel@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 (3.18.5.1-1.fc23) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Remove RPM 4 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:40:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 17:41 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 14:07 +0000, Joshua Lock wrote: > > > > This series removes RPM 4 and code to support it from OE Core. > > There > > are > > several known issues with using RPM 4 and it seems better to > > acknowledge it's > > unsupported by removing it from OE-Core than to leave  it in a non > > -functional > > state. > > > > Please review the following changes for suitability for inclusion. > > If > > you have > > any objections or suggestions for improvement, please respond to > > the > > patches. If > > you agree with the changes, please provide your Acked-by. > I think I'm in favour of removing it at this point as its not getting > much attention. > > I'd note that we need to remove the QA test for it: > > selftest/imagefeatures.py:    def > test_rpm_version_4_support_on_image(self): Right, thanks for catching this. I've pushed a patch to remove this to the same branch, I'll submit a v2 with this removal included once the RFC has had another day or so to collect comments. Regards, Joshua