From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BFB6AC00 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elite.brightsigndigital.co.uk ([213.210.30.29] helo=phil-desktop) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ain1M-0005ce-UV; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 18:56:41 +0100 Message-ID: <1458755798.3476.186.camel@pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Bill Randle , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:56:38 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1458748461-4643-1-git-send-email-william.c.randle@intel.com> References: <1458748461-4643-1-git-send-email-william.c.randle@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] insane.bbclass: tighten lib_re and exec_re patterns to avoid false positive X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:56:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 08:54 -0700, Bill Randle wrote: > lib_re would match files like "/libsoletta.so.0.0.1-gdb.py" which are > not valid library filenames. What are the consequences of it matching things that are not libraries? > Tighten up the re for lib_re and exec_re so they match only valid > sonames (.so or .so followed by major version and optional minor > version and release). Where does this definition of "valid sonames" come from? p.