From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com (mail-io0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B56A62133 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f182.google.com with SMTP id o126so18315500iod.0 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:57:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:organization:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IqJAWyS1QrmQfEPFZV7GPN8mK04xrW2WQDrQlS7FVd4=; b=KMXfSPsSTissSPf1+bEwRu5pch6fSWNpTfRmztX/fdBkMw6HqpWxC5V+3hb6qmHWdB xELscU5Dd+EQ8u5l7SvEknQcSL89rYnIjCisdnTze+hPj83tkekZM6idinMDzaCsceve x8aAoh0Tjwoa0+PFyzuEUKQSOoM87bwrf3Hyai8SNMo1hdV72Rh9RLP6hHZ71Gzb3/yq J/Zdrven/O5O3/ojmvdSuJQlHCxTNM63UUbUnfsO9UuT6YXqQmYsqaAIy5fgQvWR0Wqg 10WZHzI3svfO7iYsX8DVIG34n7Hzs1UoS96Q6cKmjx7vr4b8LRe1MT9+0i0KHtpG6V+V BV4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IqJAWyS1QrmQfEPFZV7GPN8mK04xrW2WQDrQlS7FVd4=; b=F4qKdBJxpfiQkpdA8nSDYgbamw12Y3DzKvSFN9vdtQDRkiZh5zwPNrTpKFXLZ40AUE GNmZSR0yPoctlEhtGakZ5sBliskgiQ6O28i9qkWEyxjSl6YhoQd06iGLO+CmTM6kk9s4 UArIR4vLZ7x5pVNV5TO2gdET3GZ5dnU4G2ByZOf6b2cWX0l3K463D87tcO/Lyx/khF86 duTLZczzt+r0WEY4QbDrz9621rgFncWsnhyV/VkuqyznGroGk8QA5KPWBVkk3rp3+ULW gnnidLC1dde6SOV8xVch9beClWvggXhHtN3FKjvj67iucH71bQ5fG81IdjkY55fKcE8Z 2s3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWdGZ/li2WfVQLJkbDm6FzaobZTtDBSih1a1Ax8VAsgAexoIYfEsmpC8FYyTJBgdkxl X-Received: by 10.107.13.133 with SMTP id 127mr2647557ion.129.1460447824753; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8D633.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.214.51]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id au6sm14885831igc.0.2016.04.12.00.57.03 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1460447821.25299.7.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: OpenEmbedded Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:57:01 +0200 Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Busybox syslogd/klogd and journald X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:57:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello! Can anyone think of a reason why busybox syslogd and klogd are enabled even when using systemd's journald? journald already captures both dmesg and syslog output, the other two daemons are just plain redundant. Is it perhaps because it is unclear during compilation of busybox whether the daemons are needed? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.