From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECC060721 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 06:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u4P6xQTS010177; Wed, 25 May 2016 07:59:26 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id cKeCS2Ynowkj; Wed, 25 May 2016 07:59:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u4P6xN0I010174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 May 2016 07:59:24 +0100 Message-ID: <1464159563.9570.90.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Gary Thomas , Khem Raj Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 07:59:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <57454A49.7030700@mlbassoc.com> References: <57453968.9080600@mlbassoc.com> <60AB59B2-92D3-426A-8EB8-9FC717EC087E@gmail.com> <57454A49.7030700@mlbassoc.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: sip.bbclass? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 06:59:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 08:46 +0200, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2016-05-25 08:13, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > On May 25, 2016, at 8:34 AM, Gary Thomas > > > wrote: > > > > > > I was just wondering why sip.bbclass is in OE-core (at least > > > the Poky version master:c7e614c438706) when nothing uses it? > > > > OE-core can have components which are commonly used in OE > > infrastructure, especially bindings > > may be checking all layers in layerindex would better answer your > > question > > My impression was [perhaps erroneously] that for an object to be > in OE-core, it had to be _needed_ by some other object in OE-core. > Many recipes have been migrated out when there was no longer a > use for them, so why not .bbclass files as well? Most other > layers that need .bbclass files that aren't in OE-core just have > their own classes... Nothing in OE-Core uses extrenalsrc directly but we'd still want something like that in the core so I don't think the rule is absolute. What we wouldn't want to see is multiple layers maintaining different and potentially incompatible versions of a class file. That said, I think there are a few that we probably could clean up. Cheers, Richard