From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBEA6FF93 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u6KEruSA014803; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:53:56 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id pJs06EZUy_yV; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:53:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u6KErqMS014798 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:53:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1469026432.23580.14.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: akuster808 , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:53:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <578F8DA0.3020200@gmail.com> References: <1466609398-17634-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> <1466609398-17634-2-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> <578F8DA0.3020200@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] build summary: add gcc version being used. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:53:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 07:41 -0700, akuster808 wrote: > I noticed this patch was being carried in mut builds and no is > missing. > > does that mean this is rejected? I've been meaning to reply to this. I can certainly understand why we might want to add things to the summary, equally, we do need to carefully select what we display here. My own personal belief is that we need to rationalise what is there as there are some key things missing which are probably more important than gcc version. With gcc version, I'm very tempted to try and get OE-Core back to a single gcc version rather than try and put better debug messages in place as we never intended to have multiple versions. So I guess I'd prefer we try and rationalise things a bit and put more thought into this... Cheers, Richard