From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1E0771F1 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 12:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u79C9S1X031443; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:09:28 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id JHXH52WAIe8T; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:09:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u79C9QG8031440 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 9 Aug 2016 13:09:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1470744566.8166.48.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Jose Lamego , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, "Lock, Joshua" Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 13:09:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] oeqa: Split configuration from the code X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 12:11:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 09:22 -0700, Jose Lamego wrote: > Improve oeqa-selftest capabilities and UX by placing > test configuration features and variables into a separate > configuration file. > Configuration file reading is done through a new library in > oeqa.utils and specific configuration files for each test are > stored in a separate directory. > > [Yocto 9389] Looking at these changes, I'm not 100% convinced this is an improvement in readability or experience. Right now, I can look at the test case definition and get a reasonable idea of what its doing. After the change, I have to read two files at once, side by side in order to have a clue what the test does. Is that an improvement? I'm open to persuasion on why this patchset is a good idea but the pieces I looked at didn't seem to help much :/ Cheers, Richard