From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B62731CB for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u7IGtUTI016592; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:55:30 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id xz04f_IV6VOd; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:55:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u7IGtPux016589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:55:26 +0100 Message-ID: <1471539325.16712.18.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Awais Belal , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:55:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1471523878-32164-1-git-send-email-awais_belal@mentor.com> References: <1471523878-32164-1-git-send-email-awais_belal@mentor.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] insane.bbclass: handle INSANE_SKIP for license-checksum X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:55:32 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 17:37 +0500, Awais Belal wrote: > The function populate_lic_qa_checksum() is used to do the > QA test for license-checksum but it does not handle the > scenario where a package adds license-checksum to its > INSANE_SKIP and hence fails in such condition. > This patch adds handling of INSANE_SKIP to the > populate_lic_qa_checksum() function so it returns > cleanly in such a scenario. license-checksum is not per package. Its already handled based on WARN_QA and ERROR_QA so I don't think we need to complicate this further. You could for example set: WARN_QA_remove_pn-XXX = "license-check" ERROR_QA_remove_pn-XXX = "license-check" Skipping license checksums is likely a bad idea anyway and not something we want to make easier? Cheers, Richard