From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC006010D for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id i138so3380949wmf.3 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 07:19:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xDxO6MlEcbHCvpgFazcNfzEVNFTX81N4IoehDs1QYlA=; b=UiJZictEv+F7KKuOp0FsxzyOziyibMiAG5OTQrRNOjl7LeNIOF9tlOIEwwPrxXMMsx DPu3mtGCOjzNReSOKzuPKzF/+O7fi8BWUpvDG57oT9LC2o43JbCen9RlPeNAuWKGS8+3 ++ZS0nsN2a1zThOGi+VNOLoNL771uKKhCM66JdKbdB9yzNdBB9saai3JruIP5KR/F7kT c/ZdzW3UmjmgCcXgQ0Y8UFg8GX4yoUl/272PJEJn2eQyNvSQvDbExh6km05aR2i2uPT7 WVnIgq781bWcD4RN0tt5+zxAHJHliiSBsqmjgKgv+jYkuxD6VVO8Zlc7tbQ0kr3xsLLp Szdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPfzNf9nLp3eCaNzt04PtXteOvZJV52qcIDdlZV3+KoiqXMam0mOjxK4QYUJcvCAA== X-Received: by 10.28.107.144 with SMTP id a16mr3935796wmi.75.1472566768004; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 07:19:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([185.46.212.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e5sm18928814wma.13.2016.08.30.07.19.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 07:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1472566766.8449.29.camel@andred.net> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Draszik To: Bruce Ashfield , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:19:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <94a7387f-cc88-2e7f-21b6-57970dfdbb04@windriver.com> References: <1472547914.8449.25.camel@andred.net> <94a7387f-cc88-2e7f-21b6-57970dfdbb04@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] kernel-yocto: streamline patch, configuration and audit phases X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:19:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Di, 2016-08-30 at 09:05 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2016-08-30 05:05 AM, André Draszik wrote: > > > > My kmeta stuff is located directly inside two meta-* layers (i.e. not in > > an > > extra git repo), where the 2nd layer's kernel recipes .bbappends to the > > 1st > > one with additional kmeta things. > > > > This used to work fine, but since this commit it doesn't anymore as only > > the > > kmeta stuff from the 2nd layer is being copied into workdir. > > > > Have I been doing something that wasn't guaranteed / supposed to work in > > the > > first place? Or should that still work? Is it worth fixing or should I > > rethink my approach? > > That was complexity that I had tried to remove, but thinking on it a > bit, I think I can restore that without adding much complexity. > > I'm just finishing work on the 4.8 kernel today, and can look at this > tomorrow. Thank you Bruce! > Do you have any public layers that I can reference to pull together a > test case ? Unfortunately not :-( But I'm happy to test and report back! Cheers, Andre'