From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2158365CBF for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 23:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u7UN1i2p024933; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:01:44 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QoJgu9qK2few; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:01:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u7UN1cw9024930 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:01:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1472598098.29583.61.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: "Randle, William C" , "Yang, Liezhi (Wind River)" , "Burton, Ross" Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:01:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1472162353.11000.34.camel@intel.com> References: <1472162353.11000.34.camel@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/10] runqemu: refactor it and remove machine knowledge X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 23:01:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 21:59 +0000, Randle, William C wrote: > On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 22:45 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > > So close! qemuarm64 is breaking on the AB: > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-arm64/bu > > ilds/536/steps/Running%20Sanity%20Tests/logs/stdio > > > > I suspect we're passing some options to runqemu that you didn't > > cover in your testing. > > > > Ross > > > It looks like it's just a missing space between the -m arg and > -device: > -m 512-device I added an attempt at a fix for this into -next FWIW Cheers, Richard