From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67E060107 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u7VGvw9O005798; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:57:58 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mHYBwSVJT_D1; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:57:58 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u7VGvrT6005795 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:57:54 +0100 Message-ID: <1472662673.29583.90.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Enrico Scholz , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:57:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Replacement for tslib? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:57:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 17:42 +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Hello, > > tslib is more or less mandatory for resistive touchscreens but it was > removed some days ago. This breaks e.g. meta-qt5 layer which depends > on it. > > Is this removal really final (which would be really bad, because > resistive > touchscreens are used e.g. in industrial environments)? The underlying pressure was from xcalibrate never having been merged into x11 and hence needing to replace xtscal by xinput-calibrate. With that change, the need for tslib wasn't clear. Its was also frustrating having two sets of pointercal files, one for xinput-calibrate and one for tslib. That said, I can see the need for tslib and if that is the only way to support these touchscreens in qt5/qt4 we might have to reconsider that. Are you sure the kernel interfaces that xinput is using don't work for qt4/qt5? If not, we may need to reconsider tslib... Cheers, Richard