From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D29377382 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 14:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u85EiHuD025857; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:44:17 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id uFWuXg6k2DBw; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:44:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u85EiC40025793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 5 Sep 2016 15:44:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1473086651.20226.14.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Otavio Salvador Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 15:44:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1472639558.29583.70.camel@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] lttng-modules: Update 2.7.3 -> 2.8.0+master X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 14:44:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 11:40 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 7:32 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > We need master for the changes to work with 4.8 kernels. > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie > This broken for kernels which does not enable CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS. > > Up to now, the lttng-modules build were fine if this was disabled > just > printing a warning on the build. Now it makes build fail. > > The behaviour changes was made on: > > https://github.com/lttng/lttng-modules/commit/ca62d279e2e83fd46b8a04e > 6ad4471e9f8fc7c47 Hmm, any idea how we should proceed then? > Another thing I noticed is that we ought to be using stable-2.8 > branch or name the recipe accordingly as master is in fact 2.9-pre. We'll need to rename it then as there are changes in master needed for 4.8 kernels which is why I upgraded it in the first place. Cheers, Richard