From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424EE7700A for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 21:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Sep 2016 14:41:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,297,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="165579052" Received: from chang-s2600cp.jf.intel.com ([10.54.77.22]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Sep 2016 14:41:29 -0700 From: Jianxun Zhang To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:42:37 -0700 Message-Id: <1473284559-187471-1-git-send-email-jianxun.zhang@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Subject: [PATCH 0/2][PROPOSED] libcap fix and update X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 21:41:30 -0000 Need some experts to review this patch series. I am not really sure for if what I fixed is a valid case or if fix is the best answer. The validation before submission is very limited too. I ran into the compiling issue when build an application and found this recipe cannot be built without specifying anything. I don't feel the existing options are passed to make with test, and guess EXTRA_CONF won't work with this makefile-based project. The second patch is a following-up when I saw there is another option in the similar situation and seems to be obsolete now. Jianxun Zhang (2): libcap: fix compiling issue when not having libpam libcap: remove dependency on attr meta/recipes-support/libcap/libcap_2.25.bb | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4