Re: [PATCH] image.bbclass: do not check size of the debugfs image

["André Draszik" <git@andred.net>]

Somebody did mention last week (Monday?) on IRC that mails are not arriving.
In the mailman web interface they aren't missing though (which is what I
sometimes use to check)... Strange

Andre'


On Mo, 2016-09-12 at 16:36 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> Well there must have been some list/gmail snafu, as I definitely don't
> have
> this patch locally but patchwork has it.  I wonder what else I'm
> missing...
> 
> Ross
> 
> On 12 September 2016 at 16:26, André Draszik <git@andred.net> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > ping
> > 
> > On Mo, 2016-09-05 at 09:34 +0100, André Draszik wrote:
> > > 
> > > The debugfs is supposed to be used in addition to the
> > > normal image for debugging purposes, it doesn't make
> > > sense to artificially limit its maximum size.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <git@andred.net>
> > > ---
> > >  meta/classes/image.bbclass | 6 ++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/meta/classes/image.bbclass b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
> > > index 07bd2d6..cb7d06d 100644
> > > --- a/meta/classes/image.bbclass
> > > +++ b/meta/classes/image.bbclass
> > > @@ -538,6 +538,12 @@ def get_rootfs_size(d):
> > >      base_size += rootfs_alignment - 1
> > >      base_size -= base_size % rootfs_alignment
> > > 
> > > +    # Do not check image size of the debugfs image. This is not
> > > supposed
> > > +    # to be deployed, etc. so it doesn't make sense to limit the size
> > > +    # of the debug.
> > > +    if (d.getVar('IMAGE_BUILDING_DEBUGFS', True) or "") == "true":
> > > +        return base_size
> > > +
> > >      # Check the rootfs size against IMAGE_ROOTFS_MAXSIZE (if set)
> > >      if rootfs_maxsize:
> > >          rootfs_maxsize_int = int(rootfs_maxsize)
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> >