From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f49.google.com (mail-it0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568F560939 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f49.google.com with SMTP id o3so10721317ita.1 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 03:27:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:organization :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UaiqQNYHlFdsdBD/wM7tv/fo8crqMJeZ5+qvW2VKUUY=; b=SiM/xOqkTmlV4sAm+Tz5GGike1D5oc4VWZ8ZkngJ0YLxMi+zRa1OYLAVM6ihPV+aH1 NZfBqyMSe6r+yd8oJxEgKX1deR/eNT0tSN7Oi2bD0kR2U6GL9scGcqrjzFZDsPIMV7UG 4MoRKHxYQ7QseRUz9JlvlVLW17yKlkqCCf2XBFOGFTPCawQDp7zlP6tTrRqjOw8cVTEl 0fVpA3zU2LgJaLxurFT5TRQ/s7qLeIa5P6IuAp013x5zEBnRhHo75oQhMEkFxNwgDh5C UTJwGUkX2I2DhKW1a27ZHvj3/eqUhASk3nNJFe4N/GwHZTwIQtKP44hls02i1RDkH17s JCsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UaiqQNYHlFdsdBD/wM7tv/fo8crqMJeZ5+qvW2VKUUY=; b=T17XENE8BP/efoCgoPvXoPVKlgXQWu/HskQH8SsJzOQo7MSidVjURWvZ2oqB3ODRDp FRidhufq0q13rgGS6QVXuPVfarbBmfRZPzj8VgqYkSrsOGfRHKpZmWsbDNOO5MiWiRei Zh5RVgOG1sfhcMkDRnY30hpiG4Z6WewlL45GzysyonqHHvl4Stku/DL5rqTt1eJwcRGn XUYzXbLv4MtB3mXwMvA7MwDsuAaDVItTSb/GfX7fX16f6rsAHtD2d7x2+pKbQwZQj/jj qOWe8de9u28l0nAcsATzMZnWjD5CKRdmkpW7+Lr+wLZ+50PZfoLG3c3OsWzmadICeaPi TY4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rlxol2uuIJT4tIqMPUN+Cy9DmX+3UMT1UwBRzfRCu47NiIOa8/2QRnXkxhiJluSLwjb X-Received: by 10.36.210.68 with SMTP id z65mr2529776itf.32.1474626446102; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 03:27:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p57A56298.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.165.98.152]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l15sm2595175ioe.14.2016.09.23.03.27.24 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Sep 2016 03:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1474626443.7161.5.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:27:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] openssl: update to 1.0.2i (CVE-2016-6304 and more) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:27:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 10:38 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Fixes several CVEs. > > It compiled for me okay for qemux86, but running the ptests showed a > problem in one of the new tests. I'll investigate that further There is one FAIL: ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./dtlstest ../apps/server.pem ../apps/server.pem Starting Test 0 Failed to load server certificate Unable to create SSL_CTX pair make[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/lib/openssl/ptest/test' FAIL: test_dtls That's because server.pem wasn't installed. I'll fix that. However, ptest-runner returns with 0, i.e. success? Should it do that? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.