Re: [PATCH][master][krogoth] archiver: fix gcc-source handling

["Wold, Saul" <saul.wold@intel.com>]

This has been merged to master ping for Krogoth

Sau!

On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 11:32 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> 
> The source archiver was not handling the gcc-source target correctly,
> since it uses the
> work-shared directory, we don't want to unpack and patch it twice,
> just as the comments
> say, but the code was not there to check for the gcc-source target.
> 
> [YOCTO #10265]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> 
>  meta/classes/archiver.bbclass | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass
> b/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass
> index 1d8e863..9239983 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/archiver.bbclass
> @@ -303,9 +303,10 @@ python do_unpack_and_patch() {
>          return
>      ar_outdir = d.getVar('ARCHIVER_OUTDIR', True)
>      ar_workdir = d.getVar('ARCHIVER_WORKDIR', True)
> +    pn = d.getVar('PN', True)
>  
>      # The kernel class functions require it to be on work-shared, so
> we dont change WORKDIR
> -    if not bb.data.inherits_class('kernel-yocto', d):
> +    if not (bb.data.inherits_class('kernel-yocto', d) or
> pn.startswith('gcc-source')):
>          # Change the WORKDIR to make do_unpack do_patch run in
> another dir.
>          d.setVar('WORKDIR', ar_workdir)
>  
> @@ -323,7 +324,7 @@ python do_unpack_and_patch() {
>          oe.path.copytree(src, src_orig)
>  
>      # Make sure gcc and kernel sources are patched only once
> -    if not ((d.getVar('SRC_URI', True) == "" or
> bb.data.inherits_class('kernel-yocto', d))):
> +    if not (d.getVar('SRC_URI', True) == "" or
> (bb.data.inherits_class('kernel-yocto', d) or pn.startswith('gcc-
> source'))):
>          bb.build.exec_func('do_patch', d)
>  
>      # Create the patches
> -- 
> 2.7.4
>