From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RWX0E-0008KJ-Pi for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:34:27 +0100 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2011 09:27:43 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,284,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="81589485" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.254]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2011 09:27:42 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:27:41 +0000 Message-ID: <1477738.LtqQ04SYOs@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.7.3 (Linux/3.0.0-13-generic-pae; KDE/4.7.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <2fe1910927e5741631767ed3611e361749c75d3c.1322812458.git.edwin.zhai@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x11vnc: Upgrade to 0.9.13 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:34:27 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday 02 December 2011 17:21:57 McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:55 AM, wrote: > > -PR = "r2" > > +PR = "r0" > > Isn't this wrong? In this case since PV has been increased at the same time (by renaming the recipe) it's not only OK, it's recommended practice. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre