On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 20:22 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote:

On 2 November 2016 at 18:37, Beth 'pidge' Flanagan <pidge@toganlabs.com> wrote:
It's been a bit since I've looked at license.bbclass, but I guess my
question here is this seems to take out all notification that a recipe
doesn't have a LIC_FILES_CHKSUM, correct?

I'd rather we maybe kept the note in and maybe whitelisted recipes that
did interesting things so that didn't appear than just ignored when a
recipe was missing it. 

Because if we don't at least bb.note it, I can see people just ignoring
it entirely (which would be bad in a lot of ways)


No, this check was belt-and-braces (the other check is a bb.error()).  Also bb.note() from tasks don't appear in the user-visible log by default, you've got to dig into the task log to see them which is buried in the work directories.

Ah, correct (I generally see them since I'm piping most of the time). Ok, in that case then yes, that makes sense.

-b


Ross