From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E9260269; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id uAI83Txk024725; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:03:29 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Az-lcDw8am9M; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:03:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id uAI83QiT024720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:03:27 GMT Message-ID: <1479456206.28508.104.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Koen Kooi , "Burton, Ross" Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:03:26 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-architecture , OE-core Subject: Re: [Openembedded-architecture] Enabling uninative by default in oe-core? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:03:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 08:15 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > > Op 17 nov. 2016, om 18:31 heeft Burton, Ross > > het volgende geschreven: > > > > Hi, > > > > Background: uninative is a class that downloads a precompiled host > > glibc  > Why can’t OE build it on-demand? What’s next, requiring prebuilt > toolchains? Its a chicken and egg problem. We could add a special "uninativesdk" BBCLASSEXTEND range of targets, then require that it built before we build anything native (or anything that needs a native tool). This would push build times up 'a little' and I suspect might not be popular. So the reason we "can't" is that its impractical, not an absolute technical constraint. Cheers, Richard