From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB4D772AA for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id m133so23776621iom.3 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 07:38:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Oi0Mz1c0njEF2kYgg5BKTniU+99o7mxbzC14thaojls=; b=OnZAtGph3x9n9CT/yxJZrrVzH+ClSoj+ToIfYm5iHMKJuDxswz8OC6ZrIjymI5AAW9 6ByWSsjjwRt6IfUfjUBrQViNjp1q8y3i0imZXY0BT8Twswct9lBt7+RGff3+QtnSLG44 UVl5O7GuZkqDKSUv3aGPfE+xQtRjM7wl7o0WqQDZjfbMAuY/Ny8mYGBQ70/gC4LxRWti QWIe5rmx43VAqKJXeYpGJXJCEeguUQEfR3KS0OQFdw+2Nkru6ujd2mUPp6S9eaSCVfam m5EZ/zyFJI4z9CJHcKq88a6QY4JbDVUya1hibeih9pB+VQ+ynBANXfrPfyuIoGWRVvRa +CWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Oi0Mz1c0njEF2kYgg5BKTniU+99o7mxbzC14thaojls=; b=SCzdSyfO/VQiJvIGKmL2Q5mHtemOQpI2z66oBWdP47OBnWFJ4zdziBddvtmGf3Y1BE gNA9Zfe1ftEpz3xFZGW75byhAMh9mhlXOkTcauja2myWaWLM6NTNQWlr/6WRFZ8NI2B0 M8RIDLOvz4ew85Nlc8ZaGWp/3kIenkYt5+TwpDMykqC7/bJGvBdK6nhaHiI/fi1lrp9I VoF1CQgyt8NWuPH9m3oUrIH/KLsBtbVxeeFYukoKTEjg1XpFNx1H0Cyhre+G+1HQVa8l fQTmiEO1pejr9Bp6T35P/SjuPUswsJrmx2Bl2jWRzBOUcoaIEojreqNtDG8TirdekKpM yKEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKlYR7ODwEBz6//6kyj7+TvxenM+UsiczY/sW1emkzP5XZylGpow87NUy12S8Ye34WW X-Received: by 10.107.36.74 with SMTP id k71mr5773514iok.157.1482334718063; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 07:38:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8F3CB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.243.203]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 130sm10910607ity.5.2016.12.21.07.38.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 07:38:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1482334714.6937.34.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Fathi Boudra Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 16:38:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <374bb6a728f368a801f961fb524290f205bb4625.1482324587.git.patrick.ohly@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: meta-luv , "Neri, Ricardo" , openembedded-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] iasl: move from meta-luv to OE-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:38:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 16:11 +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote: > On 21 December 2016 at 15:11, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > iasl is also provided by the meta-oe layer's acpica recipe. iasl is a > > bit simpler and thus seems more suitable for OE-core. > > Simpler in what sense? Less code to compile, which might matter for people who just want a working UEFI for qemu and nothing else. I haven't measured the difference, though. > acpica recipe is trivial and provide fully acpica tools. > Would you mind to import meta-oe acpica recipe instead of providing a > reduced set of acpica for not much benefit? I don't have a strong opinion about this and would be fine with moving acpica to OE-core instead, too. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.