From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531DE6FFD8 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 02:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Dec 2016 18:56:34 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,420,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="916708360" Received: from ranerica-desktop.sc.intel.com (HELO [10.3.52.169]) ([10.3.52.169]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Dec 2016 18:56:33 -0800 Message-ID: <1482893793.106950.42.camel@ranerica-desktop> From: Ricardo Neri To: Fathi Boudra Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 18:56:33 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] UEFI + Secure Boot + qemu X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 02:56:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 16:19 +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote: > > fwiw, I've been maintaining acpica recipe in meta-oe, and will keep an > eye here as well. > meta-luv supports both x86* and arm*, and we have an interest in > having the same features available and working for qemuaarch64. I was not aware of this. Perhaps there is no need for us to maintain a separate recipe in meta-luv.