From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DBD71979 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 23:33:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Dec 2016 15:33:37 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,423,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="207662095" Received: from ranerica-desktop.sc.intel.com (HELO [10.3.52.169]) ([10.3.52.169]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Dec 2016 15:33:37 -0800 Message-ID: <1482968017.106950.76.camel@ranerica-desktop> From: Ricardo Neri To: Patrick Ohly Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 15:33:37 -0800 In-Reply-To: <66377b2510edebf997b04812ff93c9ef0bb3c47f.1482324587.git.patrick.ohly@intel.com> References: <66377b2510edebf997b04812ff93c9ef0bb3c47f.1482324587.git.patrick.ohly@intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] runqemu: support UEFI with OVMF firmware X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 23:33:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 14:11 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > + # File name of a OVMF BIOS file, to be added with -drive > if=pflash. > + # Found in the same places as the rootfs, with or without one > of > + # these suffices: qcow2, bin. > + # Setting one also adds "-vga std" because that is all that > + # OVMF supports. > + self.ovmf_bios = '' runqemu has the options biosdir and biosfilename. Although the log for these options was lost when the script was migrated to python, the motivation of adding these options was to use OVMF. It uses the -L and -bios options of qemu. To my knowledge, the only custom bios at the moment is OVMF. Thus, you would ponder either removing or tweaking these options with your approach; which makes more sense to me. Thanks and BR, Ricardo