Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Jolley, Stephen K" <stephen.k.jolley@intel.com>,
	"yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>,
	"openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Yocto Project Status WW01
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:16:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483460203.4367.60.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ADD3FDE8B189B4AA2F8A3C711F8155E5732C512@fmsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 15:51 +0000, Jolley, Stephen K wrote:
> Current Dev Position: YP 2.3 M2 -> M3
> Next Deadline: YP 2.3 M2 by Jan 23, 2017
>  
> SWAT team rotation: Maxin -> Joshua
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team
>  
> Key Status/Updates:
> ·        M1 is having some QA difficulties due to some kind of bad
> interaction between the PR service and tinfoil2. We’re waiting until
> people are back from vacation and up to speed before we decide what
> to do about this.

One question which came up was whether just to cherry-pick fixes for M1
into a branch, or whether we use master. For me personally master is
tempting but its probably safer just to use an M1 branch as master has
moved on a fair bit. I wanted to give people an opportunity to express
opinions either way.

Cheers,

Richard


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-03 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-03 15:51 Yocto Project Status WW01 Jolley, Stephen K
2017-01-03 16:16 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-03 15:38 Jolley, Stephen K

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1483460203.4367.60.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=stephen.k.jolley@intel.com \
    --cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox