From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1093719C8 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id j18so2217294ioe.2 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:10:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/bV/OX0jCxJ738cxq3ZE+gbel/r/q/LBLtTtYVhxoyM=; b=Ovzbz2iPPzHLGe2+QZ9oCVXNHYifx6p3MXRCvRJIUeQtfx12v1/AlBWhas9Ngk9IyL SJleyiyRJzRWTzC+zjzhkp7Tuq01lzGEP6iRkMMEDrsLG2HD4tVLhL6JenKDCbGDKS4y LAOFzJmQETzRL1J2ucYzXHOIXWVUqvkbbUO1CRYj3UeApdEOpv++AY9ONPBSBF0lSRx5 agR0ybsB9aOSGmbBWaAGMZbv3s8NHmS/snJD3BK5La/8d0CZ6EHyM+yNjE/4OSr4pdU6 LnZDCrOeuu6QYyBoOHRQVBKHHcK16z4RwU6Z9puzuho+v/ZeFLFoDkqP3amNvDVXfbTf l8qQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/bV/OX0jCxJ738cxq3ZE+gbel/r/q/LBLtTtYVhxoyM=; b=P43EJj6icGhPXAT6JC99AHgsvcOCG98nIVozXYlZqyx4k2w5Y2I1H2dcNx0n3/tVYg wvWlOTE9oopVYP8ysWCnA3vIcfPi521zrA9YCdWQZH46p4FLAOWIIKAC3E4NSdfH2Lwd ACL1PHg3/T2OZIWQEFJcGjYNlM4dWxBcC1EpVTKh1uWiYQweG4vG6G5ADveaSl7ODQLG nGPGMpv5AE6SlHZpDsgjUkpBzT9Y4zdg+nNNADQ3JpeA9+MMvNc6o41fwMgden7Y+rNc K/7a9smSt97B+4wMZDYwmZBbtOETqm6CfIduE7zfTUYBV2HouOhXng+Ya/Wjkj+fIaF9 g9gA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLQVSbnWGnvHIwaroBcPvtTp47AIt1qAnmlhLUX/TRN9naiD+LTqEH7NcMeZEA7Zeaf X-Received: by 10.107.170.133 with SMTP id g5mr36952395ioj.148.1483776603030; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:10:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8F82B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.248.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j201sm2848587ita.20.2017.01.07.00.10.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:10:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1483776598.4383.24.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Randy Witt Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 09:09:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <8002ec38c29d685bd369fd1d2382298ca33f7b68.1483696378.git.patrick.ohly@intel.com> <1483730551.4383.19.camel@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rm_work_and_downloads.bbclass: more aggressively minimize disk usage X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 08:10:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 13:29 -0800, Randy Witt wrote: > There are times that the work directories help with the debugging of > build failures. The logs aren't always enough. So a person might want > to do something like remove the downloads, but preserve the actual > work, especially in the case of failures. > > > I'll admit it is a fabricated scenario, but in general I'm against one > knob requiring the turning of another knob. In principle I agree. Okay, let's separate the two. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.