From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFD071A92 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=tp13) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cRL59-00058c-0U; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:45:01 +0100 Message-ID: <1484149497.3966.17.camel@pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Khem Raj , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:44:57 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20170111035102.18447-2-raj.khem@gmail.com> References: <20170111035102.18447-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> <20170111035102.18447-2-raj.khem@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] glibc: Upgrade to 2.25 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:45:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 19:51 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj The log message for this commit is a bit misleading.  Glibc 2.25 has not been released (and the release is not scheduled for another three weeks) and we clearly can't upgrade to a version that doesn't yet exist. If you want to update the recipe to the current tip of master in order to get more testing of a 2.25 preview during the freeze period then I think that's a fine idea, but it should not be described as "upgrade to 2.25". p.