From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com (mail-it0-f41.google.com [209.85.214.41]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A173A731A5 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 203so20085908ith.0 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:37:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gPgAPw3fwNm5zmecA2t3Qx6u3YDGtRVZalE9YEUfbEo=; b=ZeqXCooRQQNCMcV7Y5ZApkD0i3YnQ1PC03zDiTPJFERke/zxI5HvXihqtc/IuUcSzc NpzxV9t2JH+uD6F1nXSvgEDonNn73aJ4If7bJAYSmqjO8OYYF7TyUzsfT5737ulcRn8Y EFNxwJsNZB6COvJt8Am0CVX3jFjMOf/NzuJ9A+6+XYUg/IHkuo5DaUT+1qhgYs6Iv48y thfDjJZVMj6pp+qRcXtCntycEjFznR+qjJ5F8K284LZkOQH0CYgPVaB9aHc35kMNJu7i hbxO0T5Uukmi0BeC1AK6nxei57dHQx1fIl7iv0IBcg1IeoG2TZRXQtzT6Odud3TfSTED 06tQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gPgAPw3fwNm5zmecA2t3Qx6u3YDGtRVZalE9YEUfbEo=; b=eyV1/R6dkzm6kshYuzL2LiFn+7PMv4ggmK+0idLmjPNtvZ1eeiwFrst10oJ85lh33J xcP85JLfGDo9sg/IqsBkT2BRdukuLODAsGkJvPFrJesHXYmWmg1HHnOmj0MAX9FH0r+b C8owCbwlPZzj+SvPV/+F6IputM3xk37cls+0/KFZ6y2NqgJ4B1cVExjil2NHcxZTA2eG yE+s4+zRM478vObCIz+RhzTa7cxYGS7j8qlFY/8sONdC1BXAr2lMHWk2Yz8vae2eULJa B/AzS3sxCVzSp3o0utY+EbvB9lqeT2YW0dwHgR1hcxiFyROby98SLi5wM8pTnu2HfZVy cD/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKMh7wtaE0PBxFwqMAKB/V+cYfTKZASHTnPdqcJJ1yKcFMyOP5jSduwIzLV3CoAAj6e X-Received: by 10.107.10.156 with SMTP id 28mr13446163iok.18.1484919434307; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:37:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p57A56DD5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.165.109.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g186sm1347983itb.21.2017.01.20.05.37.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 05:37:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1484919430.23233.118.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Ross Burton Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:37:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1484846629.23233.83.camel@intel.com> References: <1483977580-11236-1-git-send-email-ross.burton@intel.com> <1484846629.23233.83.camel@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] flex: upgrade to 2.6.2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:37:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 18:23 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > Perhaps someone with more knowledge about flex can provide some > guidance? > > Fathi, is that something that you or upstream have come across? After looking into this some more I've come to the conclusion that this looks like a bug in flex, so I have filed https://github.com/westes/flex/issues/164 I also have a workaround for acpica, which I am going to add to V3 of the UEFI/OVMF patch series. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.