From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com (mail-it0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D765D77342 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 203so20002695ith.0 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:13:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JpHVRT6NEv1nQADiwk1EIDwK9481+7azfn/NejA91HQ=; b=DTb7q671dCqA9nQpiKXk3QGBLb1oZoQPm/mNTYMsPK/QzaljCrmAmRrEAduZI/bjIe kHCDEbvpxBfOAJkzIn9FaBuG/pHqwLoLz9J2wtIAiBCUOpT2nMRsI41CoU2AUiniEKOS VFSjC8+hhp1odW0UDK+BzqqUYlUCa5qsSKnFFF2rA5DupJ913iexhJJ7HqN7r3e4uyEM oh4K5HQyWeqWwob4lv1sxAori20juNk5dlfb3FA5lJ4ZsWIERmnFes4ugb8dnTSO6vW6 pMjqDl60kzyK2Nv4olOmx+nL68c7YbO6s6pPUbx6+du7AT3W794GXTZpBHKHXui1EBUa O/Pg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JpHVRT6NEv1nQADiwk1EIDwK9481+7azfn/NejA91HQ=; b=tAhGuxuRIQq+qdN3W2EPdZIfb2PhKT//KMireBGgumRfbUZasN8qrVA+tcZDgTmshK hHEJeeaqEdCd9NQJM8PULobmEJl6Px4lMvuQCVQOOnFZ6JdvaOb3pqFuPUS4394ppnpB 4GtgJSPsmpG5A49aUPMV7O78hLULDUqXWbdKe/itZYbhbTl/RUZTjKcYKm/VPuk2K2qJ zpJSjJP618tD3XnVZ0aHUgwXcBEKhIDPBVtIRFVbWm0MzADMbRaLTulHAvSH6xs/dQgc oTA+YaxpJcKx1rA2jlYaKxYZXkxmoN+6bOMaUe7xSZYmLP0/gyFi1LlNOxAr2b98xtDW //6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK5qHI6GpTHBuOWEXxXrNyXOpOIm6xxqAMRE/4zXTLMOJeLq6wmoNRELFpTybV293xE X-Received: by 10.36.178.21 with SMTP id u21mr2692786ite.103.1485965622712; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:13:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DF4F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.223.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 78sm6735989ity.7.2017.02.01.08.13.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:13:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1485965619.14889.2.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Leonardo Sandoval Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 17:13:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <6e39192de91d20d920b9f4982e669874aa659625.1485902097.git.leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com> <1485904618.14144.19.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftest/buildoptions: use a thinner image to test 'read-only-rootfs' feature X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 16:13:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2017-02-01 at 09:02 -0600, Leonardo Sandoval wrote: > > On 01/31/2017 05:16 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 16:50 -0600, > > leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com wrote: > >> From: Leonardo Sandoval > >> - bitbake("core-image-sato") > >> + bitbake("core-image-minimal") > >> # do_image will fail if there are any pending postinsts > > Whilst this is certainly going to be a touch faster, I believe we do > > want to test read only rootfs with a larger image like sato to make > > sure the postinsts really do work with a read only system? > > I don't get it. What would make the test different using a larger image? The postinst of each component installed into the image must work properly in a read-only rootfs configuration. So the test is partly for image creation, partly for the components, and thus more comprehensive when using a larger image. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.