From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (mail-io0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D8071A36 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 21:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id j18so27317085ioe.2 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:20:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZKGYo2RSF9OFVz7es8VIxODPcocpj+T4t47eMrVqh9E=; b=ckXA2H4al4xbfSh0Cy1a19eFaVZXNWifoEeI8bjHoh8iSwZE/tall+/Ye2D/26jdWY NCrlvpLiv7waAjlZs7tibYHppFzaW4I7haNDov/vMNiemLiQkpg7+TjxioNgRBvBhGKv G4TuyRW1pU8lyYvgyRBl0Jq4LqhJ8rAMZK3kvjc9rL5zKoMYw370AMUMRmHok6sXtsRM LaB4JSukouOrDTs9pCgi8bX8MolXGRS6Y56P62CoODUzRX9l2poLV+s9w4BIcQfi2icS EtejUUE8SgdfFVuEztqsUDTX7ReBQkX8wrL+8Klu7cW8ehgUQuVXK57pHnigVcjBo3y5 TgWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZKGYo2RSF9OFVz7es8VIxODPcocpj+T4t47eMrVqh9E=; b=E6cNajnRYCWvrEQ5PsUQpqU5Q8nx/gUmRX2Vd309pNrPGmnCVttbZ0JlQkjbnHWyfT Y0a0xGbAL83DDeZaecEo05L/BQslWYVSUnJzIRzX+/YQUtK/3Vqk782AuR3JPazVZbhj HVDkBijRYfmJyNgz7SEuX4P5o+Dwue6ryI0XNSSMPhDqmObGcCGjAMGJDSzinLBRlfmo R0Xh7QnTzlPhACG+dZVY974WfqQqQ4aP71nJv5bTEveTUrE5sDepQfWYy3W3tvKsHmRw XdchrpImTN1O3sE6sb+een/jyOGV4nfCT2GQPGWroVa9YGwkfUS0hmqIGSEPT/DACjyp Vi/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJ7avVEf2wUiJTkS7CJ9l3wx4o51yGcGQZ8phZjkZGu5eIMQMPzPi+uOeYSeDCkc93A X-Received: by 10.107.136.195 with SMTP id s64mr10827840ioi.51.1486156859495; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:20:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8E712.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.231.18]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n30sm3255865ioe.32.2017.02.03.13.20.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:20:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1486156855.14889.103.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 22:20:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1486131492.14144.70.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: whatever happened to a proposal for "read-only" sstate? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 21:21:00 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2017-02-03 at 14:14 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > is there a command that will tell you how much shared state info a > given build would be able to take advantage of? INHERIT += "buildstats-summary" in local.conf will print that information after a build is done. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.