From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859EF71AE6 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 08:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id j13so110350899iod.3 for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:29:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HE2AvbG/bLj+egUxHb6n2hnzGZsKuvOlG1RBUNuimAw=; b=cNdNz8x8suLxmpJS63TpW6a0HKuCnwfolNlzCPqYABBbuTCjFXH7oob0SRiMjjs9e3 ADz9jfCy7J8Uxt7NyspiZkFuyBKaAL+yQiAMXt1fLy1LmlYDQsvMfjKLG/6JsUaTMjRO +qnHw/c6ak6WomC7R4dU9Bkxv1QGCvw1cF1fH24U6ZUSk+1tLfdPTcPe8puF7J6uhuRE WsO3hYrtDJWQOFfY1z1FcyeOQE1GmVDmg2wxI9VCLE83MjZIekavd2CUCslCIA7yq0j3 VvVICC7CUlyszNjXKjJBto/dtB1VX3feXvGYcqo6twSU/LC+mXvQ3ZRrVCX0zRl7HOAb aJcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HE2AvbG/bLj+egUxHb6n2hnzGZsKuvOlG1RBUNuimAw=; b=I/tnjGW4kOq2cb/l6+iEfM5noFvSmX3JgwRQadrmB36h4T3FWdYbEYjOSMW89U95GK up/njYWaQWUcIaNtfI3MtjtBSeoRNdKfxwivKbERe5DQPpyV1FTlnQOEjbTwy5Gv7N4A JKfvKzakQRcrwM3/L9WTBIgjM2xW+yio8hyhWI+FaxszFkPEl9cpCVkrradaQ0ad266z 95qzkIngGEgVWJ1q2MHiNwUoiEafptIt4dN8cjOSOrsntNLhMPgVwSaurg4qkMirSJak X18DuNWlFpwgr79/DiyOsvkz5qzifd1ddop8FRwDtMg1o3TiWRjELz/GPbFOpb0wswVc OoPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mekKBNfd0tQ0MlfkYKA75v1L5D1BngRZCokZ+XQWw9ZnnLQ8vMuYxEh86hKsNZ0SYK X-Received: by 10.107.185.212 with SMTP id j203mr9738052iof.226.1486542551512; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:29:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DEB3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.222.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q89sm10966354ioi.42.2017.02.08.00.29.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Feb 2017 00:29:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1486542547.14889.196.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Mike Looijmans Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:29:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6be3c94d-099a-907a-15f6-651ffb3d8c4b@topic.nl> References: <9b8f8f39-aa5f-cbdf-8d45-9bd0e27c9404@topic.nl> <6be3c94d-099a-907a-15f6-651ffb3d8c4b@topic.nl> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: (morty) Python exception during rootfs X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 08:29:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 17:08 +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote: > Found it. A rootfs post-process function was misspelled, and that caused it. > > I'll make a patch to improve the error message here, to make it just say that > it cannot find "func". I already fixed that in bitbake master, see commit 25df3db5 "build.py: avoid exception when function is not defined". Sorry, only now saw your original email. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.