From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f45.google.com (mail-it0-f45.google.com [209.85.214.45]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4ED371A91 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f45.google.com with SMTP id c7so38139391itd.1 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:49:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FjU6DbmI64KTTfUn/iMDF+gmZikaKjzCt2AXcb6X0Y4=; b=SM3PBbd5qgdM6y+lkD5ZCteTf5iUpy6+XCDhuBNnL51KV7DYWcBXGQfxL+ejxwMZqO mzaTSBF07BtRB3Nf/o0zjG+vfCWKzesrfiMLakoGpfwfJBJzjpAco5SY4Rk3UuwrEF9u fhx9kjnwGld9IeKWewzkeED0m8AxR6oYX5h1BDngX0VJyOzCSyrx4OfrB3k0y0OLbSIk +m9mc/9un8WyS3HniFqviqBPhziurl9kSpDK7Jw6kIt+OnhlKVyNEMKuagtyVgp/3lsH cG5klIG9wkloAuZMPjXsUO8vH9jPjNuDbJkawMaLL3AqMLU0xgdIB3uuY7wLVZz0lneo pXQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FjU6DbmI64KTTfUn/iMDF+gmZikaKjzCt2AXcb6X0Y4=; b=Z0/lHm9caZsZt5Diznu7PkklUI1K+fAy01lQYfIzFlo56sKc4/tyVtyqxaoE8eQe9p spkuzgHFiV1g/iDdNMmPzTVeUU+pB2rDHMjK7lq2scexQRet/t0NpJ/U/50n8WXZ1Zg7 /nLNYIa11lJ/8+8F12AwT9+EuNzPsfyOYXK55/gfD8ib0kx3MdRn/BvkEcqcGQaXCuZC 6el2X6wwUbqR+2HvfPjSG4oALFvXYIr4eKbldT0hsYpanTnP2m0wFIJ6aFSLonK2Fvn8 QOYuB3ltSItTDySFzP2XRL7sbkt3cuCBC831i9tNln4Mfr8/qnjB9PAYScUFjmmFAu9y MsCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m+Ad5zitOgJcXymMUvJnXW7fUqFhqwiJoQ7uUPpKseul/IbnGWu/o7wRMzSeqBkmj8 X-Received: by 10.36.88.207 with SMTP id f198mr4129337itb.44.1487087384996; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:49:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8E015.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.224.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d12sm478067iog.53.2017.02.14.07.49.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:49:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1487087381.13854.350.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:49:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1487083875.13854.331.camel@intel.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: how to select for non-volatile /var/log? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:49:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 10:12 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 09:31 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > i recall, once upon a time, a discussion of how to best support a > > > non-volatile /var/log directory: > > > > > > https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/90151/ > > > > A more recent, but also still unmerged patch for this functionality > > is here: https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/90839/ > > "more recent" would appear to be a relative term, since the date on > that is may of 2015. It was reposted late last year, I just didn't pick the more recent entry in patchwork. Here's the current one: https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/4028/ > it seems that this topic comes up every so often, > then just dies. so is there any *current* discussion to add this > feature? be nice if this issue was just resolved, one way or the > other. Fully agreed. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.