From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f45.google.com (mail-it0-f45.google.com [209.85.214.45]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E6472F7E for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f45.google.com with SMTP id d9so4031947itc.0 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:14:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IBdXOuUdw6KN7MvoGlFCLjV3XFSwFd2K91d5YkiyaCA=; b=NBsVkR3A4ruPIE5GqCZiAswQtZvsryLTPax6rM/zQoifoNQG9mOWCA74VDapeyhasN Nbgl6N2VPYirMS35+pP2q3iHlg+hzt3oAXSzq4QUI8XciRaCfIGtQNi//pOf+uKu+s2j Lx/2fUa0XkP4AOiS4YkWFtx1/VAw0OZN1ywYf0nLTtjm15gyqR08X/Tkcig6fVLzPH1N bqejHmrH+h/3g0mCSibnm97oVAJj+cj6QMilxbR/2AJWfi0TwIEkLEBJWwdRWDULdk9E Ogr41XHgwDi+RzempxpeLXeDBLNjPR1w0UUQtbzUjrNynGmlbMn1c6/1hrWqGSeKj67u 638Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IBdXOuUdw6KN7MvoGlFCLjV3XFSwFd2K91d5YkiyaCA=; b=hkbQI1K6M0aMAUkzkilQKGmYkiTbjrAYe2Jcy1boo3jBQMy1OND9ldkCjO0I4enLuN a0KSB1lUOu57Nb88BYurq5YIj8NGmEzAE+3TW+SfgvFUdJwdztiTVP8zogXU3HdUzVDc DvOLMxdFef1DPNE3E0jyBA8uvvVFgX0Esljr61j6S0n5xkj2p1fTCed26DTpiUmAgdnd qj5gcY0dkyuQJ0FGqg/JKtiIdNR781FGAdAYAo2hL9JNuAle0kbgWIONCuWdPOYVCqKH VPsB18ZcQ+2Mo8bMZcHHYTUlJZY6pbn7L2DGAuuhJBCzipkvume4IffMrwHBs6NW/KXD 6vgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n/UH06KGqrC2rBs2nstNQtW7V5XSz1cgSWTaA4zbQucqbXPagyDAn2/6DDc5xMOxt6 X-Received: by 10.107.28.198 with SMTP id c189mr2904794ioc.198.1487858926123; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (ip-64-134-128-59.public.wayport.net. [64.134.128.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v185sm1843674itf.11.2017.02.23.06.08.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 06:08:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1487858923.11306.31.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Ed Bartosh Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:08:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] wic: fix for #11017 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:14:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 17:23 +0200, Ed Bartosh wrote: > This patchset improves handling of wic native tool dependencies and > fixes minor bugs in the wic code. I haven't tested it, but the patches themselves look good to me. Thanks! -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.