From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f175.google.com (mail-io0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9710371A0F for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 12:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 90so51574797ios.1 for ; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 04:08:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j4nAHuOkPG8mw5ggTW78w0Lj40ER8XqsZ/xbJ3JSwSA=; b=vSj2K5c9qUYrorxjmKp3EFG9uOgn1fjDiLQxDVW9RePUnOM5uD6XozbAzWMZg7WnqB FS6ArIKqcU7T/HFI9YQLg9a92u+ZVYnDhZ/EcROs0+9GLWm+4rM/8Mv1kCE4pJgK+Dbl zsIVA9VG98+YyyG/wAVBLkBn7T5CgdSqwzVtM5++1MTQVGkRFfgmN7TfCjffYMWTPwjh GQH2BMvoHhyqP0HDXjBV+6+WXSMOVswERA3haXQ44dSOyZjw91t4nOryCBKqY8bINeHY tLInurvjTWEkXlESpWIYg4hh2F277dcuWS3y0BK3W5a8hwPSInOhpqxUCo+/KMHbelMc 2P6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j4nAHuOkPG8mw5ggTW78w0Lj40ER8XqsZ/xbJ3JSwSA=; b=f38QSwfksITsdwdlxELP2xwEju8T9z8lLJMFWUUatpOamJo9T2zqSNi1K7U5Z4TdMX z8U0RFqO3vBgatc/YXQPpW7ZCI3O7WOPmj14Yp1UBmYB/1JQI/JGFy759H25b+0wmVaD +NTqESK/XUAl/OJnmXU38x0ilmpGyWMCETggXEtnfNZ8Skpf0zsrQO3RjdN+i74I74YM rzoQMhiLl84QJUabMnWcMKlcZpTa00FypI8+p0KCHgturlmzxT533pnZ/CfaGgN6rAyV YkwfI+9YusoUU+9qNxvuw+1PFDF2Dt8HoTJibnqbDz6R2T8xNaK4dGeBQeAFRDBzURjj H+vA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lHbMvU7lNiaZG2nOdnH2PhXYQStuS2dyN9Ovs4gU2hjz1AisDCNKjw/FRMcZ0I56XE X-Received: by 10.107.8.85 with SMTP id 82mr12958621ioi.163.1488456497446; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 04:08:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8E17A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.225.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 10sm5398067itm.12.2017.03.02.04.08.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Mar 2017 04:08:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1488456493.7785.229.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Alexandre Belloni Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 13:08:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170302095908.l5n4l4nwjgpih5f4@piout.net> References: <1483558126-13685-1-git-send-email-mac@mcrowe.com> <20170302095908.l5n4l4nwjgpih5f4@piout.net> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Mike Crowe , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd-utils: Upgrade to 2.0.0 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 12:08:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2017-03-02 at 10:59 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/01/2017 at 19:28:46 +0000, Mike Crowe wrote: > > Upstream has started using automake which means that the recipe must now > > inherit from autotools and pkgconfig. > > > > The source tree has been reorganised too which requires the paths in the > > patches to be modified. None of the patches appear to have been applied > > upstream. > > > > They haven't been applied because they have never been submitted > upstream (despite being tagged with "Upstream-Status: Pending") That's the problem with "Pending" - it doesn't really mean that the original author has specific plans in place to get the patches upstream, and because there's no systematic tracking of "Pending" patches there's also no pressure to do so once the patch has been accepted into OE-core. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.