Re: [PATCH] gpgme: Fix issue building for the target

[Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>]

Mark, pachtest complained with this series. (manually copying and
pasting stuff from the latter tool, posted in patchwork)

On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 10:00 -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
> gpgme failed when configuring since you can only configure for one python
> system at a time (via the inherits).  So we need to have a PACKAGECONFIG
> that defines which one [or neither] you want to use.
> 
> The prior pkgconfig patch introduced the usage of the variable PKG_CONFIG,
> which is not defined anywhere.  Define this.
> 
> When building the python module, we can not call gpg-error-config, so we
> need to find an alternative way of finding the information the setup.py.in
> requires.  (In this case, it's easy to just use the environment
> STAGING_INCDIR.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
> ---
>  .../gpgme/gpgme/python-lang-config.patch           | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  meta/recipes-support/gpgme/gpgme_1.8.0.bb          | 28 +++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/gpgme/gpgme/python-lang-config.patch
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/gpgme/gpgme/python-lang-config.patch b/meta/recipes-support/gpgme/gpgme/python-lang-config.patch

* Issue             Added patch file is missing Upstream-Status in the
header [test_upstream_status_presence] 
  Suggested fix    Add Upstream-Status: <status> to the header of
meta/recipes-support/gpgme/gpgme/python-lang-config.patch (possible
values: Pending, Submitted, Accepted, Backport, Denied, Inappropriate)