From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC80E774E6 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v28Hi8It005688; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:44:08 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nBsdWtse-uC5; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:44:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v28Hi6Ap005678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:44:07 GMT Message-ID: <1488995046.22968.76.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Mark Hatle , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 17:44:06 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1488994536.22968.75.camel@linuxfoundation.org> References: <1488992224-2962-1-git-send-email-ross.burton@intel.com> <982f2830-f150-faa5-eebf-ff5ccb7972c5@windriver.com> <1488994536.22968.75.camel@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] openssl: disable cryptodev by default X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 17:44:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 17:35 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 11:28 -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: > > > > On 3/8/17 10:57 AM, Ross Burton wrote: > > > > > > > > > Cryptodev is a way for userspace to access the kernel crypto > > > drivers (and so, > > > hardware crypto). > > If the BSP does not support crypto dev, what is the harm in > > this?  It > > should fall back to standard behaviors. > Note that the implication here is that openssl depends on the kernel > building and many other pieces of the system depend on openssl so it > does bottleneck the build somewhat.  > > It also means a kernel rebuild ends up triggering half the userspace > to rebuild which is annoying for users. Just to clarify, it doesn't depend on the kernel module, only on a header so it shouldn't be triggering kernel dependencies. I was getting some recipe names confused. I think Ross is going to take another look at this patch... Cheers, Richard