From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com (mail-it0-f48.google.com [209.85.214.48]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465AD71AD1 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m27so2950652iti.0 for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 23:10:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1+6RrzBTFhkYeqVqIJueBX/ixCy92oofdVwcy7TZEFE=; b=DN6yHDGPRcix+1Rl5qqnaUzq3LRltZPfv1cWwgs+7fg4JY5vyAOax1tU7bei8NPkdm 7QPiQcB7XZGSKjk0os4O1/WCaKoUkKJK6mu6VGoa+zmaxetn5MUj+ynBHOZVRff4JDub l6Z/C7AgaDBrGCmhQExka1MAFN91vpkC8Z38TFCmP8rpmBOhhFmYiBwM+lVe+rAjkZph 24sjLYvCNk8uQOEcuVJ75DPF+1LfrmnpMBZOykMxIdjKbbqjw88VChCDdBbK4OAUQ0Ct RV9PSFPCo9/bNTHS3nTF7nKjcSqr94+U6tuJ7e8bfl+BxCvOQuZ04GV6gmDz9hBDV4+4 P7fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1+6RrzBTFhkYeqVqIJueBX/ixCy92oofdVwcy7TZEFE=; b=b7WnTbbo496lr0ocxBNew3dhxC7j3DqTROpPeWsZNLmhbgmz3kBrrPWcTGjVMydwU4 C8ZFwkozJBINWzFJYp/KKtQszwAM9yw2Rn13wT5/6AYGcEH9lDBzaJdCnEDqHix6OYta DL/DHNb4m7M+0N+xk4Q5LmbR2hgoY0p8bMnaOyVUgo/1IF0KkGOuS8QPHzesJWHnWX04 oK3m7zSVdx49E4MZqyuB0L9o5n3SmOj+T9xjIO/+fa6+7MEsw0rSsWlQNcogSDzoCzao ujDgGR4aqZJHOe+r9JydFFir4wuuany/ZbV1Mv66owj5tEdePdfsUKIRcOFIjT0GVu/C A4Pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1YdtkGOWU41upnluN4S5SECk95cFF0wfw5CZt9tUaO+L50VXPs8Bikxhf8D4zLV8lb X-Received: by 10.36.138.129 with SMTP id v123mr741213itd.108.1489129818094; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 23:10:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pohly-mobl1 (p5DE8DCF9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.232.220.249]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r10sm4055991iod.33.2017.03.09.23.10.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Mar 2017 23:10:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1489129813.7785.380.camel@intel.com> From: Patrick Ohly To: Denys Zagorui Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:10:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1489092518-25721-1-git-send-email-denys.zagorui@gmail.com> References: <1489092518-25721-1-git-send-email-denys.zagorui@gmail.com> Organization: Intel GmbH, Dornacher Strasse 1, D-85622 Feldkirchen/Munich X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gzip: add ptest X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:10:17 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 22:48 +0200, Denys Zagorui wrote: > tests don't work with 'diff' and 'less' utils from busybox I don't think that depending on diff and less is the right solution for that problem, because then enabling testing will change the system that is meant to be tested. For example, suppose that the real system only has busybox and busybox diff needs to work. That version of diff cannot be tested anymore with IMAGE_FEATURES += "ptest-pkgs" because that will pull in gzip-ptest, which then overrides the busybox diff. Perhaps the tests can be fixed to work also with busybox, or the tests can detect busybox and skip the part that depends on real diff and less? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.