From: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rm_work.bbclass: re-enable recursive do_rm_work_all
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 08:20:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1489735236.6396.136.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LYPjw9P5+CASrw6SF=w+vjtNGP7_JW=rM_pXrw05-pbDg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 22:32 +0000, Burton, Ross wrote:
> If I do a build with rm_work enabled I tend to get this error at
> rootfs time:
>
>
> ERROR: core-image-sato-1.0-r0 do_image_wic: Error executing a python
> function in exec_python_func() autogenerated:
....
> Exception: FileExistsError: [Errno 17] File exists:
> '/data/poky-master/tmp/sysroots-components/corei7-64/glibc/usr/lib/crt1.o' -> '/data/poky-master/tmp/work/intel_corei7_64-poky-linux/core-image-sato/1.0-r0/recipe-sysroot/usr/lib/crt1.o'
>
>
> ERROR: core-image-sato-1.0-r0 do_image_wic: Function failed:
> extend_recipe_sysroot
> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored
> in: /data/poky-master/tmp/work/intel_corei7_64-poky-linux/core-image-sato/1.0-r0/temp/log.do_image_wic.21552
> ERROR: Task
> (/home/ross/Yocto/poky/meta/recipes-sato/images/core-image-sato.bb:do_image_wic) failed with exit code '1'
>
>
> Reverting this patch makes it go away.
I think I have seen that before, but not necessarily (not sure anymore)
in the context of rm_work. If I remember correctly, these were really
two different crt1.o files, one from glibc, the other from
glibc-initial.
I couldn't reproduce it at that time. I'll check whether I can trigger
it now.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-17 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-14 15:29 [PATCH] rm_work.bbclass: re-enable recursive do_rm_work_all Patrick Ohly
2017-03-16 22:32 ` Burton, Ross
2017-03-17 7:20 ` Patrick Ohly [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1489735236.6396.136.camel@intel.com \
--to=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox