From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3518F77B46 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v2NGhRSx012543; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:43:27 GMT Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id T7vjUwiV1C0y; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:43:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v2NGhOp0012532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:43:25 GMT Message-ID: <1490287404.13980.231.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Andre McCurdy , OE Core mailing list Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:43:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Using MACHINE_FEATURES in a native recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:43:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 14:42 -0700, Andre McCurdy wrote: > Currently native.bbclass clears MACHINEOVERRIDES but leaves > MACHINE_FEATURES alone. Is that an oversight? Or is there ever a > legitimate reason for a native recipe to have a dependency on > MACHINE_FEATURES? There is no good reason. Currently having this dilemma with DISTRO_FEATURES too :/.  opkg-native rebuilding if you enable/disable systemd isn't expected/nice. Cheers, Richard