Re: [PATCH] selftest/pkgdata: support musl on unit tests

[Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com>]

On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 12:45 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> 
> On 30 March 2017 at 07:39,
> <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>         +        # recipe-runtime-package relation for virtual/libc
>         provider
>         +        Libc = collections.namedtuple('Libc', ['recipe',
>         'runtime_pkg', 'libpath', 'staticdev', 'utils', 'rutils'])
>         +        cls.libc = Libc('glibc', 'libc6', '/lib/libc.so.6',
>         'libc6-staticdev', 'glibc-utils', 'lib6-utils')
>         +        if get_bb_var('TCLIBC') == 'musl':
>         +            cls.libc = Libc('musl', 'musl',
>         '/usr/lib/libc.so', 'musl-staticdev', None, None)
>         
> 
> Instead of all of this, why not just change the tests to use a
> different package?  The bulk of them were just using glibc as it's
> going to be built, but we've built zlib too so the tests could use
> that instead.

If you consider that replacing the libc for another recipe/package is
fine, I go that way.

Leo
> 
> 
> Ross