From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5068A77D10 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-3) with ESMTP id v2UFXtjN011972; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:34:16 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id W9KpPZmaBrIk; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:34:16 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v2UFYCol012066 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:34:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1490888052.13980.356.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: liu.ming50@gmail.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:34:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1490860656-27448-1-git-send-email-liu.ming50@gmail.com> References: <1490860656-27448-1-git-send-email-liu.ming50@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Ming Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH] meta: define REAL_MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS/SDKTARGETSYSROOT in bitbake.conf X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:34:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 09:57 +0200, liu.ming50@gmail.com wrote: > From: Ming Liu > > REAL_MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS is being defined and referred in several > recipes, which is redundant and not easy to be overriden, and > SDKTARGETSYSROOT is also defined in two recipes. > > So move their definitions to bitbake.conf. I have been wondering why you're needing to customise  REAL_MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS? Are you having trouble with arm multilibs? If so, the patches I just sent out might be useful... Cheers, Richard